Held og lykke Conference of Parties!
Good luck to the Conference of Parties in Copenhagen! I have the privilege of traveling there over the weekend as part of a delegation organized by California’s Climate Action Reserve and its program arm, the Center for Climate Action. This delegation of over 100 individuals includes business people, state and local officials and staff (including Governor Schwarzenegger, two other U.S. governors and two Canadian premiers).
What do I expect to see and hear in Copenhagen? I am embarking upon this trip with equal measures of fascination and trepidation. I am fascinated by the notion that 100+ national governments can convene a meeting aimed at solving a global problem of enormous dimensions. I am uncertain how much insight I will be able to glean from being “close to the action”, but I am hopeful that being an official “observer” translates into some sharper insights.
I will also carry the flag for Applied Materials. In fact, here are a few points about Applied Materials’ stake in the conference and our position on the underlying issues:
- Applied Materials is supportive of the negotiation process and hopeful an agreement can be reached, if not next week then in the near future.
- International business has a direct stake in the process as there is a clear linkage between climate policy and clean technology development. Clean energy will be one of the biggest creators of jobs and economic development this century, and the key to creating sustainable demand is smart, strong policy.
- Applied Materials has been an active participant in the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Task Force on Low-Carbon Prosperity and supports the recommendations made by the Task Force earlier this year. The companies comprising WEF’s Climate Change Steering Committee, including Applied Materials, have been clear: a successor agreement to Kyoto that establishes stronger national targets and accompanying international mechanisms to facilitate achievement of those targets is needed now.
- The United States (U.S.)c an be a leader in the low-carbon economy, but only if we choose to lead.
- Applied’s priorities in the energy/climate area are a:
- Stronger renewable electricity standard (RES) than is in current legislation that includes graduated targets along the way.
- Well-funded “green bank” or similar mechanism to provide no/low-cost financing for renewable energy projects; the “Clean Energy Development Authority” in current federal legislation does this and we support it,
- Mechanism to price CO2, whether through a cap-and-trade system, carbon tax or other policy instrument, and
- Variety of other policy changes, including tax credits, national interconnect and net-metering standards, increased government procurement of renewable energy and so on.
What is causing my trepidation? An acquaintance already in Copenhagen claims the town is a ‘zoo’ at the moment! Long lines to register, long queues to buy a sandwich, standing room only at many of the side events, access to the plenary sessions has been restricted, not to mention human behaviors that could leave attendees shaking their heads. I will be reporting from the event following my arrival and will let you know whether my hopes or fears (or both) are justified. Wish me luck!




Comments
Focus on the $900B that Obama holds the checkbook for
Bruce, oh Bruce........We have at least $900B in stimulus and TARP funds unspent or returned. Why do we need to go to Copenhagen to get something rolling here? Once again the US is not leading, we are lagging. We look like beggars going to barter for a minimal commitment to another useless Kyoto deja vu. China didn't need Copenhagen to get its money down on solar! Are not alternate energy factories and power plants "infrastructure" worthy of strategic direct funding and or zero or low interest loans from Mr. Obummer? I guess not....they likely can't be built by neanderthal unions for whom Obama has a more than obvious bias. I guess if amat was the SEIU we could get a little love from the messiah! Begging for morsels and a cap and trade scheme to destroy the lower and middle class and to make Al Gore richer isn't American. We went it nearly alone in WWII. Today we look pathetic. There is no leadership in going to Copenhagen to barter for how much of a commitment we will make to CO2 reductions, We need to make a commitment to energy independence and we'll kill many birds with one stone. We will keep $500B here instead of sending it to the Middle East. We will reduce all pollutants not just CO2. We will create a new industry with exports and millions of US jobs. Its so simple. Save the airplane ticket. Change Washington. Maybe I should say change out Washington.
Thanks for your comment. All
Thanks for your comment. All I can say is that the world is indeed flat, meaning our economic and environmental fate is tied to the rest of the world. Washington can and should do more, but a global consensus on climate action will be a tremendous stimulus as well.
Having fun in Copenhagen
Hope you are having fun Bruce. Ah yes...the world is flat. But Kyoto yielded no stimulus and as Thomas Friedman said about America in his book; "America should lead and the world will follow". He opines that the century may be China's but maybe not...maybe we are still in the game.....hmm? 1st quarter is over my friend, amat seems to be walking off the field, changing teams. The EPA shot Obummer's last bullet to give him a feather in his cap at Copenhagen. Now no cap and trade need be voted by democrats who are in serious jeopardy of losing their seats in 2010......it's the administration's job now....they're handling it with the EPA. Cap and trade won't happen thankfully. Now maybe a target by EPA regulations can be mandated.....maybe Obummer will need to use some of that printed money to fund action against his EPA regs? Maybe......I wouldn't be waiting around for the EU or Russia or the 3rd world to be on board....it's not them we are competing with for our standard of living.
Thanks for your reply. All I
Thanks for your reply. All I can say is wait until Friday's close of COP 15. Although there is quite of political theater here and considerable gamesmanship, there is a lot optimism that a climate framework will emerge. It remains to be seen whether and how such a framework and a subsequent biding agreement might drive U.S. regulations. The EPA's endangerment finding is real, but it was clearly aimed at spurring Congress to action and its implementation is a long way off.
Post new comment